About a year ago, Dr. William O. Young wrote two guest posts for Lexercise on how not to treat dyslexia — Part I and Part II. These articles generated considerable reactions and continue to spark inquiries even after all this time. This interest has led me to today’s post, which looks not at specific treatments, but more generally at the challenge of making good decisions.
A parent or teacher notices that a child is struggling to read, write or spell. But children don’t all learn at exactly the same rate as their peers or siblings, so the difference is, at first, accepted as normal. After a while, as the child’s difficulties continue or become more acute, parents begin to acknowledge that there may be a problem. By this time, considerable time has been lost, the child is unhappier and the parents are beginning to feel desperate. They want answers, but they also realize that if the school or the pediatrician really understood the problem, they would be doing something about it.
The parents start to realize that help is not likely to come from the school. They talk with other parents, consult with “experts,” sift through online information, and even look in the yellow pages. Maybe, along the way, they get lucky and someone advises them to get a language processing evaluation for their child so they have an actual diagnosis to work with.
But parents are still faced with the problem, every step of the way, of knowing what questions to ask and how to judge the answers. Even if, intellectually, they want treatment for their child that is validated by scientific evidence, emotionally they want to believe the messages of hope offered by practitioners who promise miracles.
For best results, a skeptical consumer mindset is essential. Here is a checklist of things you should look for in language processing therapy:
At the 2012 convention of The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Dr. Gregory L. Lof* presented a poster to help clinicians in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) distinguish between science and pseudoscience. Dr. Lof has generously allowed us to offer this link to a PDF of his poster, Science vs. Pseudoscience in CSD: A Checklist for Skeptical Thinking. Perhaps it will help you to evaluate claims as you seek care for your dyslexic child.
If your child is struggling to read, write or spell, the critical first step in effective treatment is a professional evaluation. Take a look at the Lexercise Online Dyslexia Testing and Treatment pages or contact us at Info@Lexercise.com or 1-919-747-4557.
*Gregory L. Lof, PhD, CCC-SLP, ASHA Fellow, Professor and Chair, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston
. . . . .
Lof, G.L. (Nov., 2012). Science vs. pseudoscience in CSD: A checklist for skeptical thinking. Poster presented at the National Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
Sandie is a speech-language pathologist with more than 30 years of experience in the private practice sector. She is Visiting Assistant Professor of Communication Sciences & Disorders at University of North Carolina Greensboro, and founder/owner of the Language & Learning Clinic, PLLC, a private practice in Elkin, NC, and Greensboro, NC, specializing in communication disorders, including disorders of reading and written language.